The Future of Wool Wastewater Remediation Technologies in 2025: Discover the Game-Changing Solutions and Market Shifts Reshaping the Textile Sector. See What Will Dominate the Next Five Years!

• Executive Summary: Key Insights & 2025 Outlook
• Market Forecasts: Growth Projections Through 2030
• Regulatory Trends Impacting Wool Effluent Treatment
• Emerging Technologies: Membrane Filtration, Advanced Oxidation, and Bioremediation
• Top Innovators: Leading Companies and Tech Providers
• Case Studies: Real-World Deployments (2023–2025)
• Sustainability Drivers and Circular Economy Initiatives
• Cost Analysis: CAPEX & OPEX of Modern Remediation Solutions
• Challenges: Technical, Economic, and Regulatory Barriers
• Future Outlook: Disruptive Trends and Strategic Opportunities
• Sources & References

Executive Summary: Key Insights & 2025 Outlook

The remediation of wastewater generated by the wool processing industry remains a critical environmental and operational challenge, with technological advancements and regulatory pressure shaping the sector’s trajectory in 2025 and beyond. Wool scouring and dyeing processes produce effluents rich in organic load, grease, surfactants, and colorants, which, if untreated, can significantly impact water bodies and public health. As global sustainability standards tighten, particularly in textile-producing regions, the wool sector is under increasing scrutiny to adopt effective and economically viable wastewater treatment solutions.

Recent years have witnessed a transition from conventional primary and secondary treatment methods—such as grease recovery, sedimentation, and activated sludge processes—toward integrated and advanced technologies. Membrane filtration systems (including ultrafiltration and nanofiltration), advanced oxidation processes (AOPs), and biological treatment systems have gained traction in industrial-scale installations and pilot projects. Leading technology providers, such as Veolia and SUEZ, have expanded their portfolios to include custom solutions for wool industry effluents, focusing on closed-loop systems that enable water reuse and minimize sludge generation.

In 2025, there is increased deployment of membrane bioreactors (MBRs) specifically designed for high-strength, high-grease wool wastewater. Companies like Pall Corporation are partnering with wool processors in Australia, New Zealand, and China to pilot next-generation MBRs that combine biological degradation with fine filtration, achieving up to 95% reduction in chemical oxygen demand (COD) and substantial removal of colorants and surfactants. Meanwhile, Xylem is introducing modular advanced oxidation and electrocoagulation units for decentralized installations, aiming to improve treatability and operational flexibility for small and medium wool scouring plants.

Industry-wide, the push for water recycling and zero liquid discharge (ZLD) is accelerating, driven by regulatory mandates such as China’s discharge standards for textile effluents and voluntary sustainability commitments from brands and processors. The Woolmark Company is actively collaborating with technology suppliers and mill operators to trial and scale up best-in-class remediation technologies, with a focus on life-cycle water use and minimizing environmental footprints. Investment in automation, real-time monitoring, and digital process controls is also increasing, improving compliance and operational efficiency.

Looking ahead, the wool industry’s wastewater remediation landscape in 2025 is marked by greater integration of advanced treatment trains, digitization, and circular water strategies. While costs remain a challenge—particularly for smaller scouring operations—technology maturation, economies of scale, and supportive policy frameworks are expected to further expand adoption. The convergence of environmental stewardship, resource optimization, and regulatory compliance will continue to drive innovation and investment in wool wastewater remediation technologies in the coming years.

Market Forecasts: Growth Projections Through 2030

The market for wool wastewater remediation technologies is poised for notable growth through 2030, driven by escalating environmental regulations, increased sustainability mandates from wool processors, and rising global wool production volumes. By 2025, the sector is witnessing a steady uptake of advanced treatment solutions, particularly in regions with established textile industries such as Australia, China, and parts of Europe. The market is projected to expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) in the mid- to high-single digits, supported by both retrofitting of legacy plants and greenfield developments.

Key growth drivers include tightening effluent discharge standards and mounting pressure from both governmental and industry bodies for sustainable processing. Organizations such as the International Wool Textile Organisation (IWTO) continue to advocate for best practices in wastewater management, while major wool scouring and processing companies increasingly invest in on-site remediation. Technologies currently gaining traction include membrane bioreactors (MBRs), advanced oxidation processes (AOPs), and zero-liquid discharge (ZLD) systems, each addressing the unique challenges of wool scouring effluent—high organic load, grease, and chemical contaminants.

Market leaders in the supply of remediation technologies include integrated solution providers such as Veolia and SUEZ, both of which have extensive experience in designing and operating effluent treatment plants tailored to the textile sector. These companies are expanding their portfolios to include modular and scalable systems, targeting not only large-scale facilities but also mid-sized and even boutique wool processors seeking compliance and resource recovery. Australian firms like Tennant Company are also active in delivering automated filtration and water recycling solutions, reflecting a global trend toward process automation and digital monitoring.

By 2030, the outlook is for further integration of resource recovery into wool wastewater remediation, with value streams from recovered lanolin, biogas, and treated process water becoming increasingly attractive. The circular economy model is expected to play a more central role, especially as end users—such as apparel brands—demand traceable, low-impact supply chains. The sector’s growth prospects remain robust, albeit regionally differentiated: while leading wool-producing nations will account for the lion’s share of market demand, emerging economies are anticipated to accelerate adoption as global supply chains align with stricter sustainability criteria.

Overall, the wool wastewater remediation technologies market in 2025 and beyond is defined by regulatory momentum, technology innovation, and the expanding scope of environmental stewardship across the wool industry.

Regulatory Trends Impacting Wool Effluent Treatment

The regulatory environment for wool wastewater remediation is rapidly evolving in 2025, reflecting increasing global awareness of the environmental impacts of textile effluents. Wool scouring, dyeing, and finishing processes generate wastewater containing high levels of organic matter, grease, suspended solids, detergents, and sometimes hazardous chemicals. In response, many countries are tightening discharge limits and mandating the adoption of advanced treatment technologies.

In the European Union, the Industrial Emissions Directive (IED) continues to drive stricter controls on effluents from textile facilities, including those processing wool. The Best Available Techniques (BAT) Reference Document for the Textiles Industry, updated recently, prescribes advanced oxidation, membrane filtration, and biological treatment as key methods for compliance. EU regulators are also pushing for water reuse and resource recovery in line with the Circular Economy Action Plan. Wool processors must therefore invest in modernized treatment plants to avoid penalties or closure. Companies like Lenzing AG, known for sustainable fiber manufacturing, exemplify the industry shift towards compliance and innovation in effluent management.

Australia, a major wool producer, has strengthened its regulatory framework through state-based Environment Protection Authorities (EPAs). Updated licensing requirements for wool scouring plants now demand real-time monitoring of effluent quality, with specific limits for biological oxygen demand (BOD), chemical oxygen demand (COD), suspended solids, and total nitrogen. The trend is toward encouraging the integration of technologies such as dissolved air flotation (DAF), advanced anaerobic digestion, and membrane bioreactors (MBR). Industry leaders like Elders are investing in collaborative research to meet these tighter standards and demonstrate best practice to global customers.

China, the world’s largest wool textile producer, has set ambitious water pollution control targets under its 14th Five-Year Plan. Provincial environmental authorities have increased spot inspections and enforced mandatory upgrades to wastewater treatment infrastructure. The focus is on reducing total phosphorus and persistent organic pollutants using advanced chemical and biological processes. Large manufacturers, such as Shandong Ruyi Woolen Textile Group, are piloting new effluent recycling systems and closed-loop water management to align with both domestic and export market requirements.

Looking ahead, the outlook for wool wastewater remediation technologies is shaped by stringent compliance demands and incentives for circularity. Technology suppliers are responding with modular systems, real-time digital monitoring, and energy-efficient processes. Regulatory convergence, especially among major wool-producing and -processing nations, is anticipated. The drive for traceability in textile supply chains further amplifies the need for transparent, auditable effluent management, making regulatory trends a powerful force in shaping sector innovation through 2025 and beyond.

Emerging Technologies: Membrane Filtration, Advanced Oxidation, and Bioremediation

Wool processing generates significant volumes of wastewater laden with organic contaminants, grease, dyes, and heavy metals. The urgent need for sustainable remediation is driving rapid advancement in treatment technologies, particularly membrane filtration, advanced oxidation processes (AOPs), and bioremediation. As of 2025, industry adoption and innovation in these areas are accelerating, with promising outlooks for the next several years.

Membrane Filtration has become a cornerstone in wool wastewater treatment, with technologies such as ultrafiltration (UF), nanofiltration (NF), and reverse osmosis (RO) gaining traction for their efficiency in removing suspended solids, fats, and dissolved organics. Leading membrane manufacturers such as Pall Corporation and SUEZ have supplied systems to textile mills worldwide, with recent focus on robust, fouling-resistant membranes tailored to high-load wool effluents. In 2025, modular membrane units are being deployed for both end-of-pipe and integrated in-process water recycling, with facilities in Australia, New Zealand, and China reporting up to 90% water reuse rates and significant reductions in chemical oxygen demand (COD) and grease content.

Advanced Oxidation Processes (AOPs), including ozonation, Fenton, and photocatalysis, are gaining commercial viability as pre- and post-treatment steps. These processes target recalcitrant organics, color, and pathogens that evade conventional treatments. Companies such as Xylem and Veolia are deploying pilot and commercial-scale AOP systems integrated with membrane or biological steps, reporting up to 80% reductions in persistent organic pollutants and color. In 2025, the trend is toward hybrid systems—combining AOPs with biological or membrane modules—to optimize both capital and operating costs while meeting tightening discharge regulations.

Bioremediation is witnessing renewed interest, with tailored microbial consortia and enzyme-based solutions targeting wool grease, dyes, and ammonia. Recent projects in Europe and Australasia, supported by industry bodies such as International Wool Textile Organisation (IWTO), are demonstrating stable biological treatment of high-strength wool scouring effluents. Innovations in immobilized enzyme reactors and genetically optimized microbes are under pilot testing, with early data indicating up to 70% reductions in total organic load and improved downstream membrane performance.

The outlook for 2025 and beyond is characterized by increased integration of these technologies—membrane filtration, AOPs, and bioremediation—into multi-barrier, circular water systems. With wool producers facing stricter environmental standards and water scarcity, investment in advanced remediation is expected to accelerate, driven by both regulatory compliance and the push for closed-loop, zero-liquid-discharge operations.

Top Innovators: Leading Companies and Tech Providers

As the wool industry grapples with increasingly stringent environmental regulations and sustainability demands, a select group of technology providers and innovators are shaping the future of wool wastewater remediation. In 2025, the commercial landscape is characterized by both established filtration and membrane solution manufacturers, as well as startups advancing biological and chemical treatment processes specifically tailored for the wool sector.

Among the leaders, Veolia stands out for deploying integrated water treatment plants in textile and wool-processing facilities worldwide. The company offers membrane bioreactor (MBR) and reverse osmosis systems designed to handle high loads of organic matter and grease typical of wool scouring effluents. In Australia and New Zealand—major wool-producing regions—Veolia’s systems have been adopted at scale, with recent projects focusing on maximizing water reuse and minimizing chemical consumption.

Another key player, SUEZ, leverages its expertise in industrial water management to deliver advanced oxidation and ultrafiltration technologies for wool and textile mills. Their compact modular plants—recently installed in European and Chinese scouring facilities—are notable for combining energy efficiency with the capacity to remove persistent organic pollutants and colorants, a crucial challenge for compliance with tightening discharge limits.

In the field of biological treatment, companies such as Xylem are making significant strides by integrating aerobic and anaerobic digestion modules tailored for high-protein, high-grease wastewater streams. Xylem’s modular bioreactors are lauded for their robust performance, especially in variable flow scenarios typical of batch-based wool treatment operations.

On the innovation frontier, specialized firms are addressing the unique aspects of wool scouring effluents. For example, ANDRITZ—a global supplier of decanter centrifuges and solid-liquid separation equipment—has introduced new centrifuge models capable of efficiently removing wool grease and suspended solids, significantly reducing the organic load prior to downstream treatment.

Meanwhile, collaborative initiatives between technology providers and industry bodies are fostering rapid pilot testing and deployment of advanced solutions. Organizations like Australian Wool Innovation (AWI) are playing a pivotal role in validating and scaling up emerging remediation technologies, including enzymatic and electrochemical processes, which are expected to reach commercial maturity within the next few years.

Looking ahead, the outlook for wool wastewater remediation technologies is marked by continued investment in modular, resource-efficient systems and a growing emphasis on closed-loop water reuse. As regulations and buyer expectations become stricter, the sector will likely see accelerated adoption of integrated solutions delivered by these leading companies and collaborative industry initiatives.

Case Studies: Real-World Deployments (2023–2025)

Between 2023 and 2025, the wool industry has made marked progress in the real-world deployment of advanced wastewater remediation technologies, responding to stricter environmental regulations and sustainability expectations. Several notable case studies illustrate the sector’s transition from conventional treatments to integrated, high-efficiency systems.

One prominent example is the deployment of membrane bioreactor (MBR) systems at wool scouring facilities in Australia and New Zealand—regions with significant wool processing operations. Companies such as Veolia have provided turnkey MBR solutions tailored for wool effluent, enabling on-site biological treatment followed by membrane separation. This approach has achieved chemical oxygen demand (COD) reductions exceeding 90%, and facilitated water reuse in non-potable applications, significantly reducing freshwater withdrawals. Industry bodies like Australian Wool Innovation have reported that these projects serve as benchmarks, demonstrating both technical and economic viability.

In China, the world’s largest wool processing hub, companies such as SUEZ have partnered with local wool scourers to implement advanced oxidation processes, including ozonation and Fenton’s reagent, as tertiary treatments. These have effectively reduced persistent organic pollutants and color, meeting local discharge standards. Notably, SUEZ’s modular installations have enabled processors to retrofit existing plants without extensive downtime, accelerating sector-wide adoption.

European processors are increasingly piloting and scaling up eco-engineering approaches for wool wastewater. For instance, facilities in Italy and Spain have partnered with Xylem to integrate dissolved air flotation (DAF) with novel biofiltration media, targeting the removal of wool grease, fine solids, and nitrogenous compounds. These systems have demonstrated robust performance even with variable effluent loads, as documented by supplier field data and site audits.

A common thread across these deployments is the layering of multiple treatment stages—grease recovery, biological treatment, advanced filtration, and occasionally, zero-liquid discharge (ZLD) systems—to achieve stringent discharge limits and enable resource recovery. The combination of automated process controls and real-time monitoring, supplied by companies such as Grundfos, has further enhanced operational efficiency and compliance.

Looking ahead to 2025 and beyond, these case studies suggest a trajectory toward standardization of integrated remediation systems, with digitalization and modularity at the forefront. The successes of early adopters are setting new industry benchmarks, likely to shape regulatory expectations and investment patterns in the global wool processing sector.

Sustainability Drivers and Circular Economy Initiatives

The wool industry, particularly during scouring and dyeing, generates significant volumes of wastewater laden with organic matter, detergents, dyes, and heavy metals. As sustainability becomes a central concern in textile manufacturing, 2025 marks a pivotal period for the adoption and scaling of innovative remediation technologies targeting wool processing effluents. Regulatory pressure, especially across Europe and Australasia, is compelling wool processors to prioritize water reuse, pollution control, and circular economy models.

One of the leading sustainability drivers is the tightening of discharge standards by governmental agencies, which incentivizes mills to invest in advanced treatment solutions. Technologies such as membrane bioreactors (MBR), advanced oxidation processes (AOP), and zero-liquid-discharge (ZLD) systems are increasingly implemented. For example, Veolia—a global leader in water technologies—has deployed custom solutions for textile effluent, including wool sector clients, that combine ultrafiltration, reverse osmosis, and biological treatment to achieve near-complete recycling of process water.

In 2025, circular economy initiatives are gaining traction, notably through collaborative efforts. Wool processors are partnering with technology providers to pilot nutrient and chemical recovery schemes from wastewater streams. Companies such as SUEZ, known for their resource management expertise, are collaborating with textile manufacturers to develop systems that recover valuable byproducts—like lanolin, a natural wool grease—and recycle process water internally, reducing both environmental impact and operational costs.

Australian wool producers, coordinated by organizations such as Australian Wool Innovation, are at the forefront of piloting and commercializing closed-loop water treatment systems. These efforts are supported by industry-wide sustainability frameworks and are being closely monitored for scalability across the global supply chain. Additionally, Scandinavian groups, including members of Nordic Wool, are focusing on decentralized, modular wastewater solutions that cater to small and mid-sized mills, enabling more inclusive adoption of circular practices.

The outlook for the next few years suggests a shift from end-of-pipe treatment toward integrated, process-oriented water management. Digital monitoring and real-time analytics are being embedded to optimize chemical dosing and minimize waste generation. As wool processors adapt, they are expected to meet or exceed the sustainability expectations of major apparel brands and increasingly eco-conscious consumers. The convergence of regulatory compliance, consumer demand, and circular economy innovation is poised to reshape wool wastewater remediation, making it a model for sustainable practice in the broader textile industry.

Cost Analysis: CAPEX & OPEX of Modern Remediation Solutions

Cost analysis for wool wastewater remediation technologies—focusing on both capital expenditure (CAPEX) and operational expenditure (OPEX)—is a central concern for industry stakeholders as environmental regulations tighten and sustainability targets intensify in 2025 and beyond. Modern remediation solutions for wool processing effluents include a range of technologies such as advanced oxidation processes, membrane filtration, biological treatment, and chemical coagulation-flocculation. Each comes with distinct financial profiles that are shaping investment patterns and operational choices among wool scouring and textile manufacturers.

For membrane-based systems, such as ultrafiltration (UF) and reverse osmosis (RO), initial CAPEX can range from $500,000 to over $2 million for medium-scale installations, depending on treatment capacity, integration with existing infrastructure, and degree of automation. Notably, industry-leading suppliers like Veolia and SUEZ (now part of Veolia) have reported increased demand for modular, containerized solutions, which can help reduce installation time and upfront costs. These modular units are also being adopted by small-to-mid-sized wool processors in Australia, New Zealand, and China, addressing both scalability and compliance needs.

Operational expenditure (OPEX) is heavily influenced by energy consumption, membrane replacement cycles, and consumables such as chemicals for cleaning and maintenance. For membrane systems in wool wastewater, OPEX typically ranges from $0.70 to $1.40 per cubic meter of treated water, with energy accounting for up to 60% of total operating costs. The lifespan of membranes—often three to five years—remains a critical factor, with suppliers like Nitto Denko Corporation (through its Hydranautics division) providing advanced, fouling-resistant membranes to lower replacement frequency and ongoing costs.

Biological treatment technologies, such as moving bed biofilm reactors (MBBRs) and sequencing batch reactors (SBRs), are favored for their lower energy requirements but demand higher land use and longer hydraulic retention times. Suppliers like Xylem and Evoqua Water Technologies (now part of Xylem) offer packaged solutions tailored for textile and wool sectors, with CAPEX typically starting at $300,000 for small-to-mid-sized operations. OPEX for biological systems can be lower—often $0.30 to $0.70 per cubic meter—though sludge disposal and process control add to recurring expenses.

Looking ahead to the next few years, industry analysts anticipate incremental reductions in both CAPEX and OPEX as digital monitoring, automation, and hybrid system designs become more prevalent. Wool processors are increasingly leveraging smart controls and data analytics to optimize chemical dosing and energy use, further driving down operational costs. Regulatory incentives and penalties are also accelerating the adoption of advanced remediation, with a notable pivot toward closed-loop water reuse, particularly in high-consumption regions.

Overall, while upfront costs for modern remediation technologies remain significant, ongoing innovation and regulatory alignment are expected to improve cost efficiency, making sustainable wool wastewater management increasingly mainstream by the late 2020s.

Challenges: Technical, Economic, and Regulatory Barriers

Wool wastewater remediation technologies face a complex array of challenges as the industry seeks to meet stricter environmental standards and implement sustainable practices in 2025 and beyond. Despite advances, technical, economic, and regulatory barriers continue to impede large-scale adoption and optimization.

From a technical standpoint, wool scouring generates highly variable effluent containing high concentrations of grease, suspended solids, organic matter (e.g., wool grease, suint, detergents), and sometimes heavy metals, which complicates treatment. Conventional methods such as chemical coagulation, dissolved air flotation (DAF), and biological processes are often limited by high chemical and energy requirements or inefficacy in reducing all pollutants to acceptable levels. Membrane technologies, like ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis, are increasingly piloted for polishing stages but are hindered by fouling and maintenance costs. For instance, companies such as Veolia and SUEZ offer advanced industrial wastewater solutions but report that high fouling rates and costs remain obstacles for wool sector applications, prompting ongoing R&D investments.

Economic barriers are equally significant. Many wool scouring facilities are small or medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) with limited capital to invest in advanced remediation infrastructure. The cost of installing, operating, and maintaining modern treatment systems can be prohibitive, especially for those located in regions with lower regulatory pressure or narrower profit margins. Even with incentives, the payback periods for technologies like membrane bioreactors or advanced oxidation processes can extend beyond what is commercially attractive. Equipment suppliers such as Xylem acknowledge this challenge and are focusing on modular, scalable solutions, but widespread deployment is still limited by upfront costs and the need for skilled operators.

On the regulatory front, wool processing industries must comply with increasingly stringent discharge standards, particularly in countries with ambitious environmental targets such as Australia, New Zealand, and members of the EU. Regulatory uncertainty can be a double-edged sword: while clear standards drive investment, shifting or regionally inconsistent regulations create uncertainty that delays decision-making. Organizations such as Australian Wool Innovation collaborate with stakeholders to interpret and influence policy, but the pace of regulatory change often outstrips the sector’s ability to adapt technologies and processes. Furthermore, new requirements for water reuse, sludge management, and chemical minimization are expected to escalate in the coming years, demanding continuous technological evolution and investment.

Looking forward, the wool industry’s ability to overcome these technical, economic, and regulatory barriers will be critical to achieving both compliance and sustainability. Partnerships between technology providers, industry bodies, and regulators will play a pivotal role in fostering innovation and ensuring economically viable, scalable solutions for wool wastewater remediation.

Future Outlook: Disruptive Trends and Strategic Opportunities

Looking ahead to 2025 and beyond, the landscape of wool wastewater remediation is poised for significant transformation, propelled by both technological innovation and regulatory pressures. The wool processing industry has long faced challenges related to effluent containing high loads of organic matter, surfactants, and persistent chemicals, driving demand for advanced, sustainable water treatment solutions. Increasingly stringent environmental standards in major wool-producing regions, especially in the European Union and Australia, are accelerating the deployment of disruptive technologies and reshaping strategic priorities for both mill operators and technology providers.

A key trend is the integration of advanced oxidation processes (AOPs)—such as ozonation and photocatalysis—into mainstream effluent treatment trains. These processes target recalcitrant pollutants, including residual detergents and dyes, and are being adopted by several leading wool scouring and processing facilities. Notably, companies like Veolia, a global leader in environmental solutions, are collaborating with textile and wool producers to pilot and scale up modular AOP-based systems designed for the unique characteristics of wool wastewater. Such partnerships are projected to drive wider industry uptake, especially as lifecycle cost advantages and improved water reuse rates become more apparent.

Biological treatment remains at the core of wool wastewater management, but the next phase involves more tailored, high-rate bioreactors and hybrid systems. Providers such as SUEZ are developing compact membrane bioreactor (MBR) and moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) solutions specifically engineered for high-strength textile effluents. These systems are expected to see growing adoption in 2025, particularly in regions where discharge limits are being tightened and water reuse is prioritized.

Membrane technologies—ultrafiltration, nanofiltration, and reverse osmosis—are also gaining ground, not only for final polishing and recycling but as part of zero-liquid discharge (ZLD) strategies. Market-leading suppliers such as Pall Corporation and Toray Industries have introduced robust membrane modules that tolerate high fouling loads typical of wool scouring operations, with new anti-fouling coatings and automated cleaning cycles. The next few years are likely to see further improvements in membrane durability and cost-effectiveness, making closed-loop water systems more financially viable for medium-sized mills.

Strategically, wool processors are seeking not only compliance but also competitive differentiation through eco-certifications and circular models. Partnerships with technology innovators and end-users are fostering pilot projects for onsite water recycling and sludge valorization, including recovery of lanolin and biogas production. As the sector moves towards digitalization, real-time monitoring and AI-driven process optimization will further enhance treatment efficiency and transparency, supporting both regulatory reporting and sustainability marketing.

In summary, the coming years will see disruptive trends in wool wastewater remediation led by modular advanced oxidation, tailored biological-membrane hybrids, and digitally enabled circular solutions. Strategic opportunities abound for technology providers and mills willing to invest in next-generation systems that deliver both environmental and economic value.

Sources & References

• Veolia
• SUEZ
• Pall Corporation
• Woolmark Company
• International Wool Textile Organisation
• Veolia
• SUEZ
• Tennant Company
• Lenzing AG
• Elders
• ANDRITZ
• Australian Wool Innovation
• Australian Wool Innovation
• Nordic Wool